---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

Foreign exchange traders who venture out on their own will inevitably experience all the pitfalls in forex trading before they can truly achieve self-redemption.

---

In the two-way trading system of the forex market, almost every trader who relies on self-exploration cannot bypass a growth path full of trial and error—only by personally navigating the various typical pitfalls in forex trading can they truly complete cognitive iteration and the reconstruction of their trading system, ultimately embarking on their own path of "self-redemption." This breakthrough in understanding gained through practical experience often cannot be directly obtained through the experience of others; it must rely on the trader's own personal experience and profound reflection.
In the early stages of exploring two-way forex trading, the first misconception that most traders fall into is the excessive reliance on and blind pursuit of "trading techniques." Traders at this stage often fall into a cycle: first, they follow a so-called "senior mentor" to learn a trading technique, from indicator application to candlestick pattern analysis, seemingly mastering a complete trading method. However, once applied to actual trading, they repeatedly face losses. Then, they attribute the losses to "insufficient technique" and seek another mentor to learn a new technical system, from moving average systems to MACD divergence, then to wave theory and Fibonacci retracements. Each learning experience is accompanied by renewed expectations of "profitability," but the final result is often still losses. This cycle repeats until they have encountered almost 80-90% of the mainstream trading techniques on the market and experienced countless cycles of "learning-practice-loss," only then gradually realizing that simply relying on technical indicators cannot achieve stable profits; in fact, many times, technical signals can even become "misleading factors" in market fluctuations.
Once the blind faith in technical analysis is broken, many traders will turn their attention to "fundamental analysis," attempting to grasp market trends by studying macroeconomic data and economic calendars. They began spending considerable time monitoring central bank interest rate decisions, GDP growth figures, inflation rates, unemployment rates, and other macroeconomic indicators. They meticulously recorded the release time and expected values ​​of each important data point, attempting to find a logical basis for their trades by analyzing the correlation between "positive/negative data" and exchange rate fluctuations. For example, when US non-farm payroll data exceeded expectations, they predicted a stronger dollar and went long on the dollar against other currencies; when Eurozone inflation data exceeded the central bank's target, they anticipated a possible interest rate hike by the ECB and thus went long on the euro. However, in actual trading, they often found that the correlation between fundamental data and exchange rate fluctuations was not always linear—sometimes positive data was accompanied by a decline in the exchange rate, and sometimes negative data pushed the exchange rate up. This "expectation gap" and "market pre-emptive pricing" led many traders relying on fundamental analysis back into losses, and made them realize that fundamental analysis alone could not constitute a core logic for stable profits.
After encountering setbacks in both technical and fundamental analysis, some traders turned their attention to a more "niche" analytical dimension—the order flow of major forex institutions or banks. They believed that fluctuations in the foreign exchange market were essentially driven by capital, and that major institutions and banks, as "large capital players" in the market, directly determined short-term exchange rate trends through their order flows. Therefore, by accurately studying and tracking these institutions' order data—for example, by viewing changes in buy and sell order volumes through Level 2 data or obtaining information on institutional position changes through third-party platforms—it was possible to "follow the big money" and profit. With this understanding, they began to focus their efforts on studying various indicators of order flow, attempting to find the "traces of institutional manipulation" in the complex order data. However, in practice, they quickly discovered that institutional order flows often possessed strong "concealment" and "instantaneousness"—the entry and exit of large funds rarely presented "obvious signals," instead often concealing their true intentions through methods such as "order splitting" and "fake orders." Ordinary traders found it difficult to obtain complete and accurate order flow information through public channels; even if they occasionally captured some seemingly clear signals, they might be "bullish/bearish" traps deliberately released by institutions, ultimately leading to further losses for traders. This detour regarding "order flow research" is a process almost every trader seeking "shortcuts" will experience. Even if someone warns beforehand that "researching order flow is unlikely to be profitable," most traders are hesitant to believe it and will still choose to try it themselves.
In fact, these detours in forex trading are essentially "inevitable steps" in the cognitive upgrade process for traders—the reminders and experience sharing of others often cannot replace personal practical experience. Like many successful traders who ultimately achieve consistent profits in the forex market, they too received well-intentioned advice from their mentors in their early stages: "Don't blindly chase technical analysis," "Don't over-rely on fundamentals," and "Don't blindly trust surface-level signals from order flow." However, at that time, they also struggled to accept these views, insisting on exploring according to their own understanding. It wasn't until ten, twenty, or even more years, losing tens of millions of dollars in initial capital and experiencing countless setbacks and reflections, that they truly understood the wisdom of their predecessors' warnings and gradually saw through the essence behind these detours: the core of forex trading is not "finding a perfect analytical method," but rather building a trading system that suits oneself and can cope with market uncertainty, including risk control, mindset management, and disciplined execution. Only after traders have personally experienced these detours and completely shattered the illusion of a "single profit logic" can they truly settle down to build their own trading system and understand how to achieve consistent profits in the complex and ever-changing forex market.
Finally, I'd like to include an essay by the renowned Chinese female writer Eileen Chang, "The Inevitable Detours." Her profound explanation of the "inevitable paths of growth" resonates deeply with the growth trajectory of forex traders—behind every detour lies the accumulation of knowledge and the maturation of the mind. I hope this article can help more forex traders understand the true meaning of "detours," to be less impetuous and more rational and resilient on their journey of exploration, and ultimately find their own path to profitability.
The Inevitable Detours
At the crossroads of youth, a small path once appeared, faintly beckoning me.
My mother stopped me: "You can't take that path."
I didn't believe her.
“I came this far myself, what else don’t you believe?”
“If you could come this far, why can’t I?”
“I don’t want you to take the wrong path.”
“But I like it, and I’m not afraid.”
My mother looked at me with heartache for a long time, then sighed: “Alright, you stubborn child, that path is difficult, be careful!”
After setting off, I found that my mother hadn’t lied to me; it really was a winding path. I bumped into walls, stumbled, and sometimes even bled, but I kept going, and finally made it through.
When I sat down to catch my breath, I saw a friend, naturally very young, standing at the crossroads I had once crossed. I couldn’t help but shout, “That path is impassable!”
She didn’t believe me.
“My mother came this way, and so did I.”
“Since you both came this way, why can’t I?”
“I don’t want you to take the same detours.”
“But I like it.”
I looked at her, then at myself, and smiled: “Take care.”
I was grateful to her. She made me realize I was no longer young, that I had begun to play the role of “someone who’s been there,” and that I suffered from the common “roadblock” ailment of those who have been there.
On the road of life, there is one path everyone must take: the detours of youth. Without stumbling, without hitting walls, without getting bruised and battered, how can one forge a strong will, how can one grow up?

In the forex market with margin trading and two-way transactions, the real danger doesn't come from the fluctuations of candlestick charts, but from the trader's unwillingness to admit defeat and the fear of losing hard-earned profits.

---

Once an account incurs floating losses, most people's first reaction isn't to cut their losses according to the established stop-loss, but rather to make "breaking even" their sole objective: every additional pip movement in the price seems like a glimmer of hope for recovery, so they keep lowering their stop-loss, adding to their positions to average down, and even removing the stop-loss line altogether, using "long-term holding" as a self-deception; as a result, small losses are dragged into a margin call, and the account's net value slides irreversibly like sand in an hourglass.
But when positions are in the green and profits are emerging, the same mindset immediately switches to fear mode: fear of drawdowns, fear of losing a sure thing. So, two or three points early, positions are hastily closed, cutting what could have been ten stop-loss triggers into mere scraps. In the long run, profits never outpace losses, and the equity curve only oscillates downwards.
Refusing to accept losses and fearing profit retracement are like two timers that alternately activate, locking the trader into a cycle of "holding on when losing, running when winning." The market merely provides prices; the real loss orders are issued from one's own fingertips.
The only way to break this deadlock is to factor risk into costs beforehand, like transaction fees: write down stop-loss and target levels before opening positions, use mechanical orders instead of impulsive trades, and include "admitting mistakes" and "conceding profits" in the trading plan, rather than leaving them to intraday emotions. Only when losses are accepted with equanimity and profits are allowed to run can the account truly break free from the trader's psychological constraints and begin to truly engage with the market.

In the two-way trading ecosystem of the forex market, there is a phenomenon that is easily overlooked yet extremely cautionary: for forex novices, achieving substantial profits in the initial trading phase is often not a cause for celebration, but rather a potential source of trouble later in their trading career.

---

This kind of short-term, huge profit, seemingly an affirmation of a novice's trading ability, can actually mask the randomness of market fluctuations and the element of luck in trading decisions. It subtly distorts the novice's understanding of the essence of trading, laying the groundwork for serious losses later on—countless forex trading cases prove that those novices who "get rich quickly" in the early stages of the market, if they fail to recognize the true nature of profit in time, will mostly end up in a quagmire of losses.
In the practice of two-way forex trading, novices who achieve substantial profits in a short period are prone to a cognitive bias: mistaking the "luck" brought by occasional market fluctuations for their own "skill" that surpasses the market. This cognitive bias stems from a lack of understanding of the operating logic of the forex market—short-term movements in the forex market are influenced by multiple factors such as macroeconomic data, geopolitical events, and market sentiment, exhibiting a high degree of randomness. Often, a novice's profits do not come from accurate predictions of market trends, but rather from coinciding with the market's short-term fluctuations. However, novices often fail to realize this, attributing their profits to their trading strategies, analytical abilities, or even "intuition," leading to overconfidence in their abilities. This overconfidence further fosters disdain for professionals: when novices see their short-term returns far exceeding those of top global investment fund managers (most top fund managers have annualized returns consistently around 20%), they subjectively believe that "top fund managers' returns are nothing special," even questioning their professional competence and feeling that their trading skills far surpass those of industry elites. This mindset completely shatters a novice's awe of the market, causing them to gradually abandon rational analysis in subsequent trades and rely instead on subjective judgment and wishful thinking, thus sowing the seeds for future risks.
Driven by flawed perceptions, novices often take a series of actions that exacerbate risk: First, they drastically increase their investment, putting more principal or even borrowed funds into forex trading, attempting to replicate the experience of "getting rich quick"; second, they blindly use high leverage—the leverage mechanism in the forex market is a double-edged sword. When used properly, it can amplify returns, but if risks are ignored, it can also magnify losses exponentially. Novices, blinded by short-term profits, often choose leverage ratios far exceeding their risk tolerance (such as 50x, 100x, or even higher), believing that "high leverage will allow them to make big money faster." However, the randomness of the forex market always exists. When market movements contradict a novice's expectations, the risks of high leverage can erupt instantly: losses that were manageable with low leverage will rapidly expand under high leverage, potentially depleting account funds in a short period and leading to catastrophic losses. Even more alarming is the fact that such losses are often devastating—not only wiping out all the initial profits of a novice, but also potentially causing a significant reduction in their principal, even incurring debt, and completely destroying their confidence in trading.
From a long-term perspective of forex trading, for beginners, "experiencing setbacks and achieving success later in life" is the true "blessing." "Experiencing setbacks" refers to beginners experiencing moderate losses and setbacks in the early stages of entering the market. Through these experiences, they gradually recognize the complexity of the market and their own shortcomings, building a sense of awe for the market. Through continuous trial and error, reflection, and adjustment, beginners gradually develop a trading system that suits them, mastering core competencies such as risk control, money management, and mindset adjustment. These competencies are the key to supporting long-term profitability. "Late bloomers" does not mean that profits come late, but rather that a stable profit model is formed through long-term accumulation. When a novice has mature trading skills, although it may be difficult to achieve "get rich quick" in the short term, he can achieve continuous and stable profits while controlling risks. This profit model can not only bring considerable long-term returns, but also help novices "hold onto their wealth". Because through the ups and downs, beginners learn how to balance returns and risks, how to remain rational when profitable, and how to cut losses promptly, avoiding impulsive decisions due to short-term fluctuations, thus truly achieving steady growth in their account funds.
In fact, forex trading is essentially a "counter-intuitive" practice. Short-term profits test luck, while long-term profits test ability. For beginners, initial "big wins" may seem like "good luck," but are actually a misconception about their abilities; while initial "setbacks" may seem like "misfortune," they are actually necessary steps in accumulating experience and improving skills. Only by abandoning the illusion of "short-term riches," facing market risks squarely, and honing trading skills through continuous learning and practice can beginners truly establish themselves in the forex market and achieve long-term stable profits—this is the most valuable "blessing" in forex trading.

In two-way trading in forex investment, the trader's initial capital is of irreplaceable importance.

---

This is similar to the path to wealth for ordinary people in traditional society. In traditional thinking, ordinary people typically accumulate their first pot of gold around the age of 30 through frugality and careful budgeting. Afterward, they no longer rely solely on savings, but on the power of compound interest to continuously grow their wealth. However, it is worth noting that early wealth accumulation mainly depends on the accumulation of principal; the power of compound interest only becomes apparent later. Developing the ability to make money is the primary task in achieving financial freedom. The foundation of this earning ability lies in the accumulation of principal, not compound interest. Without principal as a foundation, how can money make money?
In the field of forex investment, the importance of initial capital is equally self-evident. Without sufficient initial capital as support, all forex investment trading activities become meaningless. This is why the vast majority of losers in the forex market are small-capital traders. These traders, lacking sufficient initial capital, often exhibit a natural timidity during trading. However, the reality is that this timidity makes it difficult for them to succeed. While some might argue that the hundreds or thousands of dollars held by small-capital traders constitute initial capital, strictly speaking, this capital is not true initial capital; at best, it's like small chips used for casual gambling. To consider these meager funds as initial capital in forex trading is undoubtedly disrespectful, even sacrilegious, to the forex trading profession. This may be one of the real reasons why the number of forex traders has gradually decreased in recent decades, and why the forex market has gradually lost its vitality.

Large-capital forex investors are tacitly rejected by all forex brokerage platforms, not because of their poor character, but because their earning power is too strong.

---

In the two-way trading ecosystem of forex investment, forex brokerage platforms, as the core hub connecting traders and the market, have business logic and profit models that directly determine their preferences for different types of clients. This preference is not based on subjective emotions, but rather stems from the potential interest relationship between the platform and the trader, especially in a betting model where their returns show a clear inverse correlation.
From the current mainstream operating model of the forex market, most forex brokerage platforms have a "betting" attribute with traders. That is, the trader's profit essentially corresponds to the brokerage platform's loss, while the trader's loss directly translates into the platform's revenue. Within this zero-sum game framework, the core interest of brokerage platforms naturally tends to attract and retain traders who are more prone to losses; these clients are undoubtedly the platform's most favored group. So, what kind of traders are most likely to incur losses? From the perspective of trading behavior and risk control, traders with the three characteristics of "overleveraging," "frequent trading," and "not using stop-loss orders" are often the high-risk group for losses. Heavy trading means traders concentrate a large amount of capital in a single trade. If the market moves against expectations, they face huge risks of capital drawdown, even leading to account liquidation. Frequent trading causes traders to ignore the true nature of market trends due to over-trading, while constantly accumulating transaction fees continuously erode account funds. Failing to set stop-loss orders leaves traders without a risk defense mechanism against sudden market fluctuations, allowing small losses to gradually escalate into irreparable major losses. Because these traders' trading habits are inherently high-risk, their probability of loss is far higher than other groups. Brokerage platforms not only profit directly from their losses but also obtain stable commission income through frequent trading. They even expect these traders to deposit more funds after their accounts are depleted, creating a cycle of "loss—deposit—further loss." Therefore, these traders are the most favored customer type for platforms.
Corresponding to the preferred customer type, forex brokerage platforms most dislike traders with mature trading systems, strong risk control capabilities, and high probability of profit, especially those whose main trading styles are "light position trading," "long-term positioning," and "strict stop-loss." Lightly leveraged trading allows traders to maintain capital flexibility and risk resistance in the face of market volatility. Even if a single trade results in a loss, it won't severely impact the overall account balance. Long-term positioning requires traders to develop strategies based on macroeconomic fundamentals and long-term market trends, avoiding irrational decisions due to short-term fluctuations and making it easier to capture trend-based opportunities. Strict stop-loss orders set clear risk boundaries for each trade, effectively controlling the scale of losses and keeping risk within an acceptable range. For these traders, the scientific and disciplined nature of their trading significantly increases the probability of profitability, especially when choosing relatively stable currency pairs. Through long-term trend following and strict risk control, they often achieve consistent and stable returns. From the perspective of brokerage platforms, the profits of these traders directly compress the platform's revenue margins—not only can they not profit from the losses in their trades, but their low-frequency trading model also reduces commission revenue. Furthermore, the platform may even incur substantial losses due to the traders' continued profitability. Therefore, these clients with professional trading skills are a key target for platforms to exclude.
It's worth noting that this exclusionary behavior is even more pronounced when dealing with large-capital traders, even forming an implicit "consensus" within the brokerage industry: when a large-capital trader is refused service by a brokerage, other brokers often adopt the same refusal. This phenomenon doesn't stem from the trader's personal character, but rather from the fundamental conflict between the trading characteristics of large-capital traders and the platform's profit-seeking objectives. Large-capital traders typically possess ample capital reserves and mature investment philosophies. Their trading strategies are often primarily long-term investments, rarely engaging in short-term, ultra-short-term, or high-frequency trading. This trading model not only effectively mitigates the risks of short-term market fluctuations but also allows them to obtain stable returns by grasping long-term trends, resulting in an extremely low probability of loss for large-capital traders, and even enabling them to maintain a profitable state for extended periods. For brokerage platforms, the presence of large-capital traders is almost entirely unprofitable: firstly, under a long-term trading model, platforms cannot generate commissions through frequent trading; secondly, due to traders' strict risk control and money management, platforms cannot absorb their stop-loss orders, nor can they wait for them to be liquidated due to over-leveraging or failure to use stop-loss orders. Ultimately, they can only watch large-capital traders profit through the platform's trading channels without gaining any direct benefit. This "free-riding" partnership completely deviates from the platform's profit goals. Therefore, rejecting large-capital traders has become an unspoken choice within the industry.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---